The Wine Collector

Practical wine collecting advice from Steve Bachmann, Vinfolio's CEO

 
29
Jul
2009

June fine wine prices retreat modestly after large May gains

WinePrices.com's most actively traded fine wine indexes were down 1%-4% in June 2009 based on global auction results (the Dow Jones Average was down 0.6%) after their 10%-17% gains in May.  See the full summary results page for all nine indexes (and archives for prior months). The California 100 index finally showed some life and the Italian and Port indexes managed to turn in positive performances.

 

Auction activity in July is limited and non-existent in August so look for September results for the next major opportunity to assess price levels.

24
Jul
2009

Marketplace tutorials and coming enhancements

Categories: Marketplace

Since the Marketplace launched about 2 weeks ago, VinCellar has contained links to buyer and seller tutorials on the VinCellar home page.  We just added these tutorials to our web site as well. 

For the buyer tutorial, visit our Buy or bid page and click on the red box on the upper right of the page which looks like the image on the left below. For the seller tutorial, visit our Marketplace overview page and click on the green box which looks like the image on the right below).  For a preview of planned Marketplace enhancements, read this Vinfolio blog post.

21
Jul
2009

Defining who needs an alcohol license (in CA)

Categories: Retailing

The Wine Spectator published a story today titled "Is California preparing an Internet wine crackdown?" in which I'm quoted.  The issue is less over online wine sales than defining the requirements for who needs an alcohol license and who doesn't.

Service provider or unlicensed alcohol business?

The California ABC's "Industry Advisory", issued in June 2009, is titled "Unlicensed third party service providers" (italics added).  In the fast-changing world of online marketing, a new class of "marketing agents" has emerged to help drive sales, not just in wine but practically every other consumer-facing product category. But is the "agent" just an agent supporting a licensed business's objectives or is the "agent" really operating an (unlicensed) business supported by the licensee?

Where to draw the line?

The ABC advisory lists fundamental privileges of a licensee including:

  1. Management decisions
  2. Pricing decisions
  3. Controlling the distribution of funds
  4. "Sale" of alcoholic beverages
  5. Profiting from the sale of alcoholic beverages

The last two points above require some clarification:

  • Selling - The ABC defines "selling" to include any service provider who "solicit orders" or makes an "offer to purchase" to consumers.  Presumably this would include taking order details (wines, quantities), shipping addresses, and payment information.
  • Profiting -The ABC claims that service providers charging a fee linked to a percentage of the sale usually equates to "profiting" from the sale.  I disagree (although Vinfolio terminated one service provider relationship anyway to avoid the ABC interpreting it differently as the story mentions).  There are basically three standard pricing models used for pricing marketing services in the online world: flat-rate advertising for listings/banners, pay-per-click, and payment linked to conversions/results (usually expressed as a percentage of the resulting sale value).  Does using a common, percentage-based pricing model (for any industry) equate to sharing in the customer's business profits?  "No."  The very term "profits" means revenue minus costs.  To participate in creating profits means having a say on all matters affecting revenues and costs which a true service provider would not be in a position to do. The third party we felt obligated to terminate because of some ambiguity in the advisory violated none of the fundamental privileges listed nor did they "sell" on our behalf.  They merely supported Vinfolio, a licensed business, in reaching its objectives. 

Bottom line: I suspect most marketing service providers to the wine industry are really that, third party service providers, regardless of their method of charging for services.  The most objective test some "marketing agents" may fail is whether they engage in the direct selling function.

16
Jul
2009

Analysis: Vinfolio Marketplace vs. Auction House fees

Since the Vinfolio Marketplace went live last week, there's been some discussion in online boards about its fees and how they compare with primary alternatives (i.e., bricks-and-mortar auction houses and online auction players). The Marketplace differentiates itself on many dimensions, including fees, but this post provides a fee-only-based comparison (OK, I've added some other comments too because "normalizing" fee charging methods requires some explanation).

Comparing  "apples to apples"

All other auction houses require the wine being auctioned to be in their custody prior to the auction.  While not required in the Vinfolio Marketplace, the seller has the option of transferring wine to Vinfolio storage first which is the nearest equivalent of the traditional auction house approach.  Therefore, for a true "apples-to-apples" comparison, the Marketplace seller's commission when sold from storage is the only relevant basis of fee comparison.

Normalizing fee methodologies

Auction houses (whether traditional or online) tend to charge both a buyer's premium and a seller's commission on a transaction. Many sellers tend to ignore the buyer's premium because, after all, it's not charged to them. That logic is fallacious because any rational buyer faced with paying a 20% buyer's premium on his/her bid (or "hammer") price, will lower his/her bid to reflect the extra cost.  Doing so ensures the total out-of-pocket price reflects what he/she believes the bottle to be worth.

The table on the right shows the universe of leading auction houses and their current buyer's premiums based on June 2009 U.S. auctions (note: if an insurance fee percentage is required, it is included).

To normalize different fee methodologies, I used a fixed $100 total price paid for a bottle and calculated the bottom-line net proceeds received by a seller (which is all anyone cares about!) when sold through different types of auction channels.  The final result is a table showing a comparable single metric representing an "equivalent" seller's commission.

Vinfolio Marketplace vs. Traditional Auction Houses

The following chart illustrates that the Vinfolio Marketplace generates greater seller proceeds than using a typical auction house.  Auction houses don't publish their seller's commission fees (why not?).  They tend to be negotiated based on the estimated value of the consignment but the range shown is fairly typical (with Acker Merrill being the exception at 0% but with their 21% buyer's premium, the net proceeds only reach $82.64).  Keep in mind that for larger consignments where the lower-end auction house seller's commission probably applies, the Vinfolio Marketplace's cumulative volume discounts would also, raising the Marketplace's net proceeds to $86.50.


Vinfolio Marketplace vs. WineBid and J.J. Buckley (WineCommune)

The following chart shows why the Vinfolio Marketplace is better than using WineBid or J.J. Buckley (a WineCommune affiliate).  Some additional explanation is needed here:

  • Winebid's seller commissions are not published (at least nowhere I could find) but are believed to vary between 12%-19% based on the volume of wine consigned.
  • J.J. Buckley is a retailer owned by WineCommune that uses WineCommune to run consignment auctions (WineCommune sellers as of 12/08 must possess alcohol licenses to use it directly, hence the J.J. Buckley "tag team").  There's no buyer's premium and the seller's commission is linked to the bottle value with break points at $250 and $1,000.  In checking WineCommune's site, there were only 3 listings with prices of over $1,000 per bottle (13% fee) and just under 10% of listings with $250 in total value (15% fee; listing measurement includes multiple bottle lots) so most people sell bottles for less than $250 which is a 17% seller's commission.  The 16.8% shown in the chart is an estimated weighted average.

Other material differences exist that you need to know about.  With WineBid and J.J. Buckley, any wine which doesn't sell in a weekly auction has its reserve and/or starting bid lowered each week until it sells (or you can ship it back to yourself any time at your expense).  If you feel like gambling, you can reduce the seller's commission to 10% at J.J. Buckley if you sign up for a weekly auction with a $1 starting bid and no reserve.  As that's an "orange" in this "apples-to-apples" comparison, I didn't include it in the chart above.

Selling fee summary

The table below says it all.  The far right column represents the "expected" fee borne by the seller based on which firm is used.

Bottom line: The Vinfolio Marketplace is the most cost-effective solution for selling your wine, even without considering its many other differentiators. Review the Marketplace overview to learn more.

 

7
Jul
2009

Vinfolio Marketplace opens for bidding

Categories: Marketplace

I'm pleased to announce that the Vinfolio Marketplace opens for buyers to submit bids tomorrow, July 8.

World's largest wine selection

Here's what you can expect:

  • 27,000+ unique items already marked for sale
  • 170,000+ bottles
  • $20+ million estimated retail value

That's far more than any retailer/auction house (and that's on day 1).

"Heaven" for wine lovers

Here's what the Marketplace offers bidders:

  • Unmatched selection (from one place, see above)
  • Set your own price
  • Sellers compete to accept bids
  • No buyer's premium

We'll continue to sell wine through our online wine store so read about whether to buy or bid.

Selling wine "redefined"

In the future, I'd like to think the Vinfolio Marketplace is compared to today's online and bricks-and-mortar auction houses in the same way as YouTube vs. television, web vs. newspapers, and Nike vs. sneakers (all examples in this Seth Godin post titled "Solving a different problem").

Here's why sellers find the Marketplace compelling:

  • No listing fees, minimum quantities, time constraints or advance preparation work needed
  • No delays in wine being offered for sale as there's no need to ship it in first
  • 100% control over sale price (obviates reserve concept)
  • Completely anonymous because Vinfolio intermediates all activities
  • Competitive (if not lowest) selling fees
  • Fast weekly payments after sale
  • Broad marketing exposure (including internationally)

The numbers above on wine marked for sale speak for themselves.

More background on the Vinfolio Marketplace

RSS Feed Generator
 
Please choose a name for your RSS feed:
Name rss feed
RSS stands for "Really Simple Syndication". It is a way to easily distribute a list of headlines, update notices, and sometimes inventory changes to a wide number of people. Think of it as a one-stop shop for all the stuff you want to read online. For the consumer, an aggregator or reader, either web-based or installed on your computer, ties it all together.

To make use of this information, you have to download and install an RSS feed reader like SharpReader. Every so often, the aggregator checks the RSS feeds you selected. You log on to the aggregator and see the updates to your favorite sites, blogs and stores, all in one place. For more information on RSS, please visit:
http://rss.softwaregarden.com/aboutrss.html
RSS Feed Generator
Click on icon to add RSS feed:
Or copy this URL into your RSS reader:

 


Vinfolio Marketplace






Forgotten password
 
Enter your email and we will send you
your password