The Wine Collector

Practical wine collecting advice from Steve Bachmann, Vinfolio's CEO

 
4
Oct
2008

More evidence of modest weakness in fine wine prices

Categories: Auctions , Wine investment

As a follow up to my last post titled Time to invest in fine wine?, I performed a similar analysis on the results of the Hart Davis Hart Fox cellar auction in Chicago on September 19-20, 2008. A few points about this cellar need to be kept in mind when evaluating the results:

  • The provenance was impeccable (even better than "typical" fine wine auctions)
  • The auction included the largest offering of Lafite-Rothschild ever to appear at auction
  • Over 700 cases of first growth Bordeaux and over 1,000 bottles of DRC were offered
  • 100% of the lots were sold for $11.2 million (see post auction press release).

The surprise to me was that despite these advantages, which would one think would translate into above average market prices, the results obtained (in aggregate) were no better than 2008 auction averages (using 8/08 YTD data). See the chart below:

If one assumes the provenance alone should have generated a 5-10% premium, then these results can be interpreted as a weakening of fine wine prices since earlier in 2008.

Even more surprising was the price performance of the premium Bordeaux and DRC lots.  In total, the eight producers below accounted for 910 lots or 57% of the 1,597 unmixed lots offered.  Only Lafite-Rothschild generated more premiums than declines to 2008 market averages (no doubt due to high Asian demand).

In fact, even with Lafite-Rothschild included, these premium wines did relatively worse than the other 43% of lots.  The chart below is comprised of the subset of 910 lots of these wines and the median (or typical) per bottle price achieved for a particular lot was 95% of the 8/08 YTD auction average.

Conclusions

The analysis above, combined with the analysis of the Zachys auction results from the same weekend, are signaling a consistent message: namely that fine wine prices are under some modest pricing pressure at the moment.  However, given the fine wine market's long-term fundamentals, I believe this is a buying opportunity for those interested in wine investing. 

In turbulent markets, there seems to be a trend towards investing in hard assets (see yesterday's WSJ story titled When stocks tank, some investors stampede to alpacas and turn to drink).  I don't know about you, but I would far prefer to invest in wine that exotic livestock.

P.S. The methodology used in this price analysis was the same as in my prior post. We took the auction price results (inclusive of buyers' premiums) for all unmixed lots sold and compared the average per bottle price per lot to the given wine's 8/08 YTD auction average according to WinePrices.com.   

2 comments:

As with the Zachys post last week, these stats are interesting and worthy of discussion, but far from conclusive. As with any ex-post analysis, we can infer association, but not causation.

Absent from these posts is any mention of the VOLUME of wine sold either across auctions in a given weekend, or in the case of HDH, at the sale itself.

The number of people looking for a case of 1996 Mouton on a given day is limited. The number willing to pay up, limited even further. Thus when a sale offers 10-20 cases of a given wine, you can quickly exhaust the supply of aggressive bidders. Further, the volume encourages bidders to be more patient and conservative than they might be otherwise.

Further, the interplay of overlapping sales in important to consider. Many bidders buy across sales and monitor results as the auctions proceed. Even in the midst of a rapidly appreciating market, there are deals and quite often large spreads in the price of identical lots.

I am not making a statement one way or the other about Steve's assertion that prices are softening at auction, only that relying on these snapshots of data are methodologically shaky.

Posted by Marc Lazar at Saturday October 4, 2008

The analysis is a "best efforts" approach to try to look at aggregate market price movement. I agree that there is competition between auctions, not to mention with retailer sources of the same wines, but this is a factor which is also present in the historical data for 8/08 YTD auctions. The same holds true for volume factors. It's impossible to adjust for either so while it may create some "noise", I don't think it changes the point, particularly when a trend is confirmed across multiple auctions (we'll see what this past weekend's Zachys' LA auction yields when the data is available).

Note that the data compared is normalized to a per bottle price for a given lot of a specific wine/year/size (which accounts for different quantities per lot).

If anyone is interested in looking at the price trends for an individual wine, they can go to www.wineprices.com. You can see 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year price graphs plus the details of every individual lot sold in reverse chronological order.

Posted by Steve Bachmann at Monday October 6, 2008






Post a comment

(You may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

 
 
 


 


Vinfolio Marketplace






Forgotten password
 
Enter your email and we will send you
your password